Friday, June 29, 2012

Low Cost Video Production for Agricultural Development via USAID and others

Some of you may know that I am involved with the ICT and New Media student group at my school (SIPA's New Media Task Force). I took the time to explore a low-cost video toolkit from USAID recently, and posted about it at the New Media Task Force blog. Since it has to do with communicating agricultural ideas, a topic I just mentioned last time, I thought I would cross-post it here too. Enjoy!


Interested in utilizing video in your projects around the world? USAID recently released a great toolkit: Integrating Low-Cost Video into Agricultural Development Projects. The guide includes sample videos, worksheets, and more. What I really like about the toolkit is the way it is organized. You can learn about: 1) how organizations are using video around the world; 2) how to assess the usefulness of video for your own organization's objectives; 3) how to make the videos; 4) how to disseminate the videos; 5) how to track impact; and 6) technical considerations. Working your way through the guide can help you figure out your objectives and what options are best for realizing them. If video is a means to your organization's ends, then you can learn from the guide and other organization's experiences how best to utilize it as an (agricultural) development tool.
The guide highlights some great organizations, including:

Digital Green: Working in India (and now starting in Ethiopia), DG has a really cool model that I think is a great fit for agricultural development. Here's a  breakdown:
The Digital Green system consists of four primary elements:
1. Using a participatory process for local video production;
2. Employing a human-mediated instruction model for video dissemination and training;
3. Deploying a hardware and software technology platform to exchange data in areas with limited internet and electrical grid connectivity; and
4. Utilizing an iterative model to progressively address the needs and interests of the community using both web-based analytical tools and interactive voice response (IVR) phone-based feedback channels.
The founder and CEO was at SIPA last year to discuss the organization's philosophy and experiences (and to recruit!). [Blogger's note: if Digital Green happen to stumble across this post, feel free to save one of those jobs for me in May 2013. Cheers! -Chris]

Agro-Insight: they have an interesting model as well:
Their model is based on the zooming-in, zooming-out (ZIZO) method, which considers both local and regional relevance when developing videos to maximize the number of farmers likely to be impacted by each video. The ZIZO approach revolves around five key principles:
1. Identify a generic topic of regional relevance;
2. Learn about context diversity through participatory research;
3. Develop videos with farmers and local field workers;
4. Test videos in various contexts and fine tune them; and
5. Scale-up and scale-out.
InsightShare: they focus on participatory video and offer up their own guide: Insights into Participatory Video: A Handbook for the Field


Video may be a technology you have mastered, but its application can be difficult. We all must investigate all options for a specific program, to avoid the following description from the USAID toolkit:
IT IS NOT UNCOMMON for development practitioners to find themselves enamored by the latest technology. Most of us know of at least a project or two that discovered that, for one reason or another, the technology that they thought would be a game changer ended up as an absolute failure. FAILFaires, which provide an opportunity for international development practitioners to share information about unsuccessful mobile and ICT interventions, have sprung up as an opportunity to learn from what went wrong. Video is no stranger to such failure. A common anecdote goes something like this: “We gave our beneficiaries video cameras, but they never used them. I’m not exactly sure why.” The truth is that effectively using video for development is never as easy as simply handing out cameras.
Hopefully this guide can help us all avoid such experiences...

4 comments:

  1. I have heard of several examples in which advanced digital cameras are passed out, only to be forgotten about. Are any of these companies exploring the use of mobile phone video technology? It certainly seems like that is becoming more prevalent in communities and would be easier to work with for several reasons. Outside of the video editing, it would reduce the need for expensive, specialized hardware that will be broken or outdated quickly. Also, it would help get around the lack of infrastructure when it means uploading the videos to the internet or sharing them amongst farmers.

    Great post, this is very interesting!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Many mobile phone videos are still low quality (and I've heard complaints on some Flip cameras as well), but you are right for sharing when low quality does not matter. Bluetooth is also a free way to do P2P sharing when you are near a friend (something Seeds of Life is toying with a bit). Much more difficult to Monitor/Evaluate than, say, Digital Green's model though!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Online video should be an essential part of every business's online marketing strategy. Because producing a video can be expensive, make sure you get as much bang for the buck as you can when you release it.

    ----------
    Perth Video Production

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, I have been reading your blog posts daily and the reason I come on your blog frequently is its compelling content


    Buy Youtube Views

    ReplyDelete